...
Abortion Clinics Near Me

Independent Abortion Providers vs. Corporate Chains

Independent Abortion Providers vs. Corporate Chains.

Independent Abortion Clinics vs. Corporate Chains: Who Supports Patients?

When you think of abortion care, you might picture Planned Parenthood, but independent clinics serve 3 in 5 patients. These locally rooted providers face unique challenges. Here’s why they’re irreplaceable.

What Makes a Clinic ‘Independent’?

  • Nonprofit or small-scale: Often the only provider in rural areas.
  • Patient-centered: Longer appointments, sliding-scale fees, and holistic support (e.g., childcare funds).

Independent Abortion Providers: Why They’re Under Threat

  • Violence: 42% of clinics report harassment (National Abortion Federation).
  • Funding gaps: Excluded from federal programs and corporate grants.

Independent Abortion Providers: How to Help

  • Donate: $50 covers a patient’s travel costs.
  • Volunteer: Clinic escorts, hotline operators, and translators are always needed.
  • Share: Follow @KeepOurClinics to amplify their work.

Comments are closed.

ABORTION RELATED FEEDS & POSTS

RSS NAF

  • Access to Mifepristone via Telehealth Continues For Now
    Statement from Brittany Fonteno, President and CEO of The National Abortion Federation, on the Supreme Court’s decision to maintain access to mifepristone via telehealth nationwide while litigation proceeds: “The Supreme Court’s decision today is critical to ensuring continued access to mifepristone through telehealth and maintaining an important and popular pathway to care for patients, especially… […]
  • NAF Responds as Supreme Court Restores Temporary Nationwide Access to Mifepristone via Telehealth
    Statement from Brittany Fonteno, President and CEO of The National Abortion Federation, on the Supreme Court’s decision to temporarily restore access to mifepristone via telehealth:  “The National Abortion Federation is encouraged that the Supreme Court has temporarily restored nationwide access to mifepristone by mail, pausing the Fifth Circuit’s sweeping and dangerous restrictions. This decision provides… […]

PRESERVE ABORTION